Retirement and 401k News

Column: 1,200 Americans already paid their 2020 Social Security tax. You'll be paying all year

January 21, 2020 –  The Los Angeles Times

 

In what has become an annual ritual, retirement expert Teresa Ghilarducci on New Year's Day counted the 200 or so Americans who effectively paid their entire Social Security tax bills for 2020 before the holiday was over.

That's because their income is likely to be so high that it took mere hours for them to reach the $137,700 wage cap on the payroll tax in effect for this year.

Ghilarducci's goal is to underscore how extreme economic inequality has destabilized the earnings base for Social Security, creating concerns about its future solvency. "Lopsided growth in earnings is the main reason behind the system's shortfall," she writes.

There are other factors too, including the increase in employer-paid health insurance premiums, which certainly are tantamount to income but aren't taxed for Social Security or Medicare. (Karen E. Smith and Eric Toder of the Urban Institute cite estimates that taxing premiums would have added more than $700 billion to Social Security's income between 2012 and 2017, an increase of more than 21%; as a result, many workers would end up with higher benefits when they retire.)

Then there's the exemption for unearned income such as dividends and capital gains. Those items constituted more than half the annual income of wealthy Americans, but aren't subject to the Social Security tax.

All this is relevant today to the discussion of how to improve Social Security benefits and ensure the system's fiscal health in the future. As we've reported, congressional Republicans have asserted that Social Security and Medicare -- "entitlements," as they cynically label them -- are the cause of the federal deficit. This while they congratulate themselves for having enacted a massive tax cut for corporations and the wealthy that is blowing a 10-year hole of more than $1.5 trillion in the federal budget. Is it any wonder that Republicans talk about gutting Social Security benefits "behind closed doors"?

Progressives argue that the best way to shore up Social Security is to raise or remove the tax cap rather than cut benefits. Some also advocate taxing unearned income. They're right: America's retirement resources have become so heavily skewed toward high-income households as traditional pensions disappear and working families find it ever more difficult to save for retirement that increasing and expanding Social Security benefits are imperative.

Let's take a closer look at who pays Social Security taxes and how.

As we mentioned, payroll taxes are levied on wages up to a specified cap that rises with inflation. It will be $137,700 this year. According to the Social Security actuaries, about 95% of all workers will earn less than that ceiling, meaning they'll see Social Security taxes taken out of their paychecks all year at a rate of 12.4%, split evenly between the worker and the employer. The self-employed pay both halves themselves. No income cap applies to Medicare taxes, which come to another 2.9% combined plus another 0.9% for households with more than $200,000 in income ($250,000 for couples).

According to the Social Security actuaries, out of 167.7 million wage earners, 211 touched more than $50 million in wage, salary or tip income in 2018 (the latest year available). Their average earnings were $95.7 million. They were the top 0.0001%. In 2020 terms, their income would cover the Social Security tax for the year roughly by noon on New Year's Day. Of course, the tax is taken out of paychecks, so they actually wouldn't pay the tax until their first pay period.

How many of these wage earners would have covered their Social Security nut by, say, the end of Thursday, the first working day of 2020? Based on the 2018 figures, that would be the richest 211 plus another 963 in the earnings range of $20 million-$50 million, whose average taxable income was $28.7 million in 2018. Total: about 1,200 taxpayers. They're the top 0.0007%, by Social Security's reckoning.

 

Obviously, that leaves the average working American far behind. Social Security says that in 2018, about two-thirds of all wage earners took in less than $50,000, the average wage. The median wage, which by definition was earned by 50% of all wage earners, was $32,838.05.

About 6% of all workers earned enough to reach the tax cap in 2018 when it was $28,400. The percentage will probably be about the same this year.

Once workers' earnings reach the tax cap, they stop paying Social Security taxes, which translates into a nice little bump in take-home pay. The higher the wage, the earlier in the year that moment comes.

Ghilarducci's analysis of the payroll tax is something of a parlor game on the theme of "Who Makes Out Like a Bandit?" But it's instructive nonetheless.

She observes that the highest-paid corporate executives in 2019 were Safra Catz and the late Mark Hurd, co-CEOs of Oracle, who earned $108 million each. At that rate, they would cover their Social Security obligations for this year at a little after noon on New Year's Day.

The estimate gets even wilder for the ultra-rich. Consider Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, whose fortune came to $114 billion in 2019. Little if any of that is probably in W-2 wage income; Amazon says Bezos collected $81,840 in salary in 2018, the most recent year reported, plus another $1.6 million in potentially taxable security arrangements.

But if we estimated Bezos' income from his wealth at the tax-free interest rate of about 1.9%, he would cover his 2020 Social Security bill by about 12:30 a.m. on New Year's Day.

One can find endless amusement -- or frustration -- playing with such numbers. But the lesson is serious. Wage earnings by the top 1% in America have grown further beyond the Social Security tax than policymakers ever expected. As Kathleen Romig of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities observed in 2016, the cap was last adjusted in 1977 to cover 90% of all earnings and indexed to inflation. Since then, earnings growth at the top has reduced that ratio to close to 80%. It needs to be readjusted, urgently, because, with every year that passes, wealthy taxpayers pay less of their fair share.

___

(c)2020 the Los Angeles Times

Visit the Los Angeles Times at www.latimes.com

Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

 

This article is written by Michael Hiltzik from The Los Angeles Times and was legally licensed by AdvisorStream via the Tribune Content Agency through the NewsCred publisher network.

Receive Your Stock

Market Updates Weekly

Enter your email address to receive information on the stock market and updates at the beginning of each week.

Disclaimer: Material is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to buy or sell any product. Past performance and any forecasts are not indicative of future results. This material was prepared and views are those solely of the author and does not necessarily represent the views of the presenting party, nor their affiliates. Because investors situations and objectives vary this information is not intended to indicate suitability for any particular investor. Direct investment in an index is not possible. Asset Strategy is unaffiliated with third-party sites, cannot verify the accuracy of, nor assume responsibility for any content of linked third-party sites. The information available on third-party sites is for informational purposes only.All information provided is for educational purposes only. The material herein does not constitute an offer to sell nor is it a solicitation of an offer to purchase any security. Offers will only be made through a private placement memorandum to accredited investors (typically have a $1 million net worth excluding primary residence or $200,000 income individually/$300,000 jointly of the last three years), or through an offering circular to qualified investors, and where permitted by law. Investments in any security are not suitable for all investors. Investments in securities involve a high degree of risk and should only be considered by investors who can withstand the loss of their investment. Prospective investors should carefully review the “Risk Factors” section of any private placement memorandum or offering circular. Investors should perform their own investigations before considering any investment and consult with their own legal and tax advisors. Past pricing structures may not be indicative of future pricing and may not result in positive returns. Securities offered through Concorde Investment Services, LLC (CIS), member FINRA/SIPC. Advisory services offered through Asset Strategy Advisors, LLC (ASA), an SEC-registered investment adviser. Insurance services offered through Asset Strategy Financial Group (ASFG). CIS, ASA, and ASFG are separate companies, all of whom are independent of The Los Angeles Times.

The information in this communication or any information within the Asset Strategy Advisors, LLC domain, and or any attachments to any AdvisorStream communication is strictly confidential and intended solely for the attention and use of the named recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this e-mail to the intended recipient, please immediately notify AdvisorStream at privacyofficer@advisorstream.com and destroy all copies of this e-mail. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. This information must not be disclosed to any person without the permission of AdvisorStream LTD. Please be aware that internet communications are subject to the risk of data corruption and other transmission errors. For information of extraordinary sensitivity, we recommend that our clients use an encrypted method when they communicate with us.